Blog

Inside Track

EEF's Health, Safety and Environment Blog

Lofstedt review of health and safety - terms of reference published

by Steve Pointer, Head of Health and Safety Policy 19. April 2011 17:39

In March Employment Minister, Chris Grayling, announced an independent review of health and safety to be chaired by Professor Ragnar Lofstedt.  Today Professor Lofstedt announced his terms of reference, making clear that regulations and compensation are very much in scope, but the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 is not.

There had been criticism that Professor Lofstedt was being allowed to write his own terms, notably from Lord McKenzie, former Minister with responsibility for health and safety.  However, as with all such reviews it's likely that the terms of reference were the result of discussion and agreement between the Minister commissioning the review and its leader.

The review will seek to determine:

  • the scope for consolidating, simplifying or abolishing regulations;
  • whether EU Directives have been 'gold-plated' in the UK with extra requirents;
  • what can be learnt from other countries;
  • whether there is a clear link between regulation and positive outcomes;
  • whether there is evidence of inappropriate litigation and compensation arising from health and safety legislation; and
  • whether legislative changes are needed to clarify the position of employers where employees act irresponsibly

The terms of reference also make clear that regulations and Approved Codes of Practice enforced by HSE and local authorities are in scope, but the Health and Safety at Work Act and other primary legislation is not and neither is legislation enforced by others such as food safety.

We've already been in touch with Professor Lofstedt and will be contributing in a constructive and balanced manner.  There is much that is good about the current health and safety regime, but also aspects that can, and should, be improved.

There are two particular areas that are undermining the good work that HSE and Ministers have been doing for some time to simplify compliance, focussing attention on practical actions to manage significant risks. 

The first is the European Commission which continues to see more legislation as the answer to all ills, without stopping to look at whether existing requirements are actually being implemented effectively.  This is not an easy problem to remedy, the UK government cannot resolve it alone.  But it is important that the review shines a light on the issue and provides some independent evidence that can help a growing alliance of member states and MEPs change the Commission's direction.

The second is the effect of the civil compensation system in driving paperwork requirements.  For all that HSE does to reduce paperwork requirements, it will come to nothing if compensation claims are still settled essentially on the basis of what paperwork was produced, rather than on what practical action was taken to actually manage the risk.  As I mentioned in a previous blog there is an urgent need to clarify the role of paperwork.

The review is a positve move and Professor Lofstedt is emanently qualified to lead it.  This looks to be a good opportunity to address the real issues on the basis of evidence, rather than the knee-jerk response based on supposition that too often dogs health and safety. 

Chris Grayling: new approach to health and safety

by Steve Pointer, Head of Health and Safety Policy 21. March 2011 14:53

This morning Employment Minister, Chris Grayling, made a major announcement on the Government's approach to health and safety. There will be an independent review of all health and safety legislation, the number of inspections will be cut by a third by focussing more tightly on high-risk sectors and those who manage risks poorly, and companies found to be putting people at risk will be charged for the cost of their inspection and follow-up action. 

EEF has welcomed the announcement that builds upon the 'Common Sense, Common Safety' report produced by Lord Young last autumn. 

Independent Review of Legislation

The Minister confirmed that Professor Ragnar Lofstedt, of Kings College Centre for Risk Management, has been appointed to lead an independent review looking at health and safety legislation with a particular remit to tackle duplication and unnecessary legislation.  He is due to report in the Autumn. 

This is a welcome step to review a whole regulatory area, rather than piecemeal changes to individual regulations.  It provides the opportunity to identify duplications, inconsistencies and inefficiencies produced by layers of different regulations and is the kind of approach we are keen to see taken in other regulatory areas, including climate and environment.  

Unlike the Young review, European legislation is very definately within scope.  In answer to my question on this, Chris Grayling recognised that EU legislation is far too often disproportionate.   He went on to indicate that the report will be made to both the UK government and European Commission and that he will be using it to inform negotiations.  This is a particularly welcome development.

Modernising the inspection regime. 

The Health and Safety Executive and Local Authorities will more tightly focus their proactive inspection – aiming at high hazard and high risk sectors as well as companies with poor records.  This will result in 33% (11,000) fewer inspections by HSE.  The Local Government Association today wrote to local authorities calling for a similar approach.  However, HSE's enforcement policy will remain the same as will its activity in investigating complaints and injury reports.      

A system - sometimes referred to as 'fee for fault' - will be introduced to charge companies for inspection and associated work if they are found to have significant failings (but not mere technical breaches).  In principle it certainly makes sense that if someone is to pay, it should be the companies who are taking an unfair short-term advantage by putting employees at risk.  Of course getting that targetting to work effectively in practice presents some challenges.  We are already engaged with HSE on this and are expecting a consultation in the summer, with implementation of a system not expect until spring 2012 at the earliest.  

Putting all of this together, good employers in most manufacturing sub-sectors can expect to see less of the regulator, but a company who does badly at an inspection can expect to be charged for the privilege and will receive a poor rating from the regulator, meaning they will be on the list for future visits.  

 Tackling the health and safety 'cowboys'

The Occupational Safety and Health Consultants' Register (OSCHR) goes live today, it has been created by a partnership between 5 professional organisations and the Health and Safety Executive.  Businesses can now search an online directory of consultants who have degree level qualifications, at least 2 years experience, complete continual professional development and are subject to enforceable codes of conduct.  1600 consultants have been accepted on the register, including over 20 of EEF's own health and safety advisers who provide consultancy support and training to businesses. 

Whilst not a legal requirement, registration is a strong indication of competence.  However, the true test will be whether the professional organisations, who are responsible for policing the register, are prepared to be robust in tackling those who oversell their services or are excessively risk-averse.  Without this, the register will bring no additional benefits.

Simplification of Compliance

Work will continue to help lower-risk small businesses comply with a minimum of fuss.  Having already issued simplified guidance and risk assessment tools, HSE today launched a new microsite called 'Health and Safety Made Simple - the basics for your business.'  This is something EEF has had input to through HSE's Small Business Trade Association Forum.

As ever, the proof of the pudding will be in the eating, but overall it was a welcome announcement that recognised the importance of effectively managing substantive risks, whilst avoiding disproportionate responses and unnecessary burdens.  Or, as the Minister put it, 'tackling the rogue employers, whilst removing red tape from the vast majority of employers who play by the rules'. 

Disclaimer
This is an informal blog about health, safety and environmental issues written by EEF's policy, representation and service delivery staff. While it is written from an EEF perspective, contributions should not be taken as formal statements of EEF policy, unless stated otherwise. Nor does it cover all the issues on which we campaign - you can check these out in more detail at our main site.

We welcome and encourage comments, but we reserve the right to remove any that are offensive or irrelevant. We are not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Tag cloud

Browse by category

About EEF

This blog is written by experts from the health, safety and environment team at EEF. We help manufacturing businesses evolve and compete.  We provide them with business services that make them more efficient and management intelligence that helps them plan.  Our work with government encourages policies that make it easy for them to operate, innovate and grow.

Find out more at www.eef.org.uk/about