Industry calls for Annual Energy Statement to stem security of supply fears

Subscribe to About EEF media release feeds


Key findings:

  • One third of companies believe Government has long-term energy strategy, almost two thirds disagree or have no view

  • Just 4% of companies believe energy infrastructure has improved in last two years, a quarter say it has worsened

  • Just 9% of companies engage in managing demand for electricity

  • Potential for manufacturing to save electricity consumption equivalent to 4% of UK total

Britain’s manufacturers are calling on the government to re-instate an annual energy statement and a series of reforms as part of its commitment to an industrial strategy, amidst new survey evidence showing a lack of confidence in the future security of supply.

The call was made by EEF, the manufacturers’ organisation in a new report ‘Upgrading Power: Delivering a Flexible Electricity System’ which examines the UK’s future supply of electricity. It makes a number of recommendations for priority action in a 2017 annual energy statement, together with proposals to deliver a more efficient, flexible and resilient power system.

Commenting, Claire Jakobsson, Head of Climate & Environment Policy at EEF, said:

“Manufacturers’ confidence in the Government’s management of security of supply is tepid at best. The last eighteen months have been a high degree of uncertainty in the energy market as a result of numerous policy changes, the Brexit vote and two new administrations in a short period of time.

“Decisions on new nuclear and coal phase out have started to steady the ship, we need a meaningful annual statement that sets out a clear and stable direction of travel for energy policy as part of an overarching industrial strategy.

“Whilst there has been significant attention paid to how we supply our electricity there continues to be too little focus on how and when we use it. Taking action on this will save significant sums of money, both for the system as a whole and companies. The potential is there, but significant reform will be necessary if we are to realise it.”

According to the report, just one third of companies agree that government has a long-term strategy for security of supply with almost half disagreeing. Furthermore, just under 4% of companies believe that the UK energy infrastructure has improved in the last two years whilst a quarter felt it had worsened.

In response, EEF believes that the government’s decision to combine the business and energy departments provides the ideal opportunity to establish an Annual Energy Statement. Whilst a previous statement did exist under the coalition government, it was largely regarded as inconsequential by most stakeholders.

In contrast, a reformed statement should outline key policy mechanisms, funding choices and provide an unequivocal understanding of the government’s vision for energy policy and decarbonisation.

This should begin in 2017 with immediate announcements on the following:

  • A full phase-out strategy for coal power by 2025

  • A strategy for the uptake of Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS). This should include an investigation by the National Infrastructure Commission into the infrastructure requirements and costs of CCS

  • Details on future support for new low-carbon generation

The report also outlines how the changing mix of electricity generation will fundamentally alter the way the UK balances supply and demand of electricity. This will require us to be more efficient and flexible in how we use it, as major consumers of electricity, the manufacturing sector has a key role to play here. 

However, according to EEF the current policy framework is unlikely to deliver this without reform. Despite 15 years of energy efficiency policy, significant amounts of cost-effective opportunities remain within the manufacturing sector.

New analysis by EEF shows this amounts to 14% of the manufacturing sector’s electricity consumption, equivalent to 4% of the UK total or, £1 billion per annum. Moreover, just 9% of companies take part in some form of demand-side response activity altering consumption patterns to save money and earn revenue.

Liam McDonagh, Director at CMR Consultants commented;

The report highlights that optimising the supply of and demand for electricity should be a function of  flexible and balanced electricity generation and storage, electricity efficiency and demand side management, bound together with an effective policy framework and appropriate incentives.”

According to EEF Government should implement the following reforms to increase the take-up of DSR and energy efficiency:

  • The development of a fully-fledged Electricity Demand Response scheme, building on the lessons learned from the two pilot schemes (held in 2014 and 2015) which allowed DSR measures to bid into capacity auction and, in particular the US experience, where DSR contributed some 4% to the New England Capacity Market via the auction.

  • Reform the capacity market to allow easier access for DSR assets in future auctions

  • Introduce a new energy efficiency investment discount on the Climate Change Levy.

  • Investigate how to maximise the DSR benefits for manufacturers of smart meters, half-hourly settlement and time-of-use tariffs


Media Team 020 7654 1576

Other articles from this author >
media icon spotlight Keep up-to-date with our latest media releases

Browse our latest media releases on what matters most to manufacturers, read the facts and our comments on all major industry developments

Read more >
contact us about EEF Contact Us

Find our locations, get in touch or connect with us on our social networks

Read more >
Online payments are not supported by your browser. Please choose an alternative browser or make payments through the 'Other payment options' on step 3.